Doc Labyrinth invents a machine to store music, after having a vision of a paper Schubert score burrowing out of a bombed building, “like a mole” with a “furious energy”. Reasoning that animals possess a survival instinct, he decides to build a machine that converts music into creatures, to preserve their longevity.
The snag is that, much like our present-day racist billionaire innovators, he can’t build anything himself. So he enlists the help of “a small midwestern university,” who for some reason build it and send it to him.
Then we get the mozart bird and the beethoven beetle. “The schubert animal was silly”. The composers’ names lose their capitalisations, and become mere characteristics. Doc makes loads of these animals, and they live in the woods near his house. He has ensured they can’t reproduce. But they can still mutate.
A mutated bach bug is fed back into the machine, producing a score of “hideous, distorted, diabolical” music.
The story reminds me of the Lexicon of Musical Invective, Nicholas Slonimsky’s compilation of critical hatchet jobs of famous composers’ symphonies. Critics, says Slonimsky, tend towards a particular “psychological inhibition: Non-Acceptance of the Unfamiliar”. As does Doc Labyrinth. He has to learn that music and technology have lives of their own.
First published in Fantasy & Science Fiction, June 1953. Collected in The Preserving Machine and Other Stories, Pan Books, 1972